multiple drafts model造句

Dennett describes his multiple drafts model of consciousness.
It has also been claimed that the argument in the multiple drafts model does not support its conclusion.
The article on the multiple drafts model is supposed to give a sympathetic but balanced description of Dennett's theory.
Remember, Dennett put forward his peculiar definition of CM with the intention of destroying that idea in his Multiple Drafts model.
The key to the multiple drafts model is that, after removing qualia, explaining consciousness boils down to explaining the behaviour we recognise as conscious.
It's difficult to find multiple drafts model in a sentence. 用multiple drafts model造句挺难的

To avoid the perceived shortcomings of Cartesian materialism, Dennett instead proposes the multiple drafts model & mdash; a model of consciousness which lacks a central Cartesian theater.
Is Dennett's definition of Cartesian materialism associated with the Dennett's Multiple Drafts Model, ie : did Dennett create a definition and then attack it?
Like a number of other theories, the Multiple Drafts model understands conscious experience as taking time to occur, such that percepts do not instantaneously arise in the mind in their full richness.
Dennett says that, " the Multiple Drafts model goes on to claim that the brain does not bother'constructing'any representations that go to the trouble of'filling in'the blanks.
I am not the first to spot Dennett's straw man approach-it is the standard criticism of Dennett's multiple drafts model ( as I have shown in the references and quotes that I introduced ).
Numerous different models have been proposed, for example, the Multiple Drafts Model which argues that there is no central Cartesian theater where conscious experience would be represented, but rather that consciousness is located all across the brain.
Some assume that this is a devastating blow against Dennett, while others have argued that this in no way confirms Cartesian materialism or refutes the multiple drafts model, and that Dennett is fundamentally right even if he's mistaken about this detail.